In Coutard v. Municipal Credit Union, the District Court dismissed a claim brought by an employee under the Family Medical Leave Act in which the employee claimed that the employer denied him leave to care for his grandfather. The District Court held that the failure of the employee that he was in a loco parentis relationship with his grandfather doomed his claim. The Second Circuit reversed, holding that the employer had an obligation to specify any additional information that it needed in order to determine whether plaintiff was entitled to such leave and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings. The plaintiff had asked the Court to grant him partial summary judgment, but the Second Circuit declined to do so. Even though it held that his claim should be dismissed on failure to give proper notice grounds did not establish as a matter of law that he was entitled to the relief he sought.
A copy of the decision can be found here.